http://ex-awwyea165.livejournal.com/ (
ex-awwyea165.livejournal.com) wrote in
nbc_medium2005-11-16 07:40 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't give a care for any 3-D show. I am not about to sit with paper glasses on my face for some bogus effect. Just give me the show and forget the disney/Sci Fi jizz.
no subject
no subject
But 3-Dness aside, doesn't the preview for next week look completely awesome?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm not trying to diminish the plight of the poor in America, here, but the way people are talking in here makes it sound like NBC is asking us to spend $20 for some paper glasses.
TV Guides cost 99 cents. In this day and age, that's the closest to free you're going to get without it actually being free. However, if you still can't afford it, either ask someone you know to buy it for you (I'm sure someone somewhere will lend you 99 cents) or find someone who gets TV Guide anyway but doesn't watch Medium. Either way, I don't think it's too ridiculous to put the glasses in a magazine that 75% of TV viewers purchase anyway. I don't buy TV Guide anyway, but I also don't mind spending an extra dollar this week.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm a 24-year-old environmental lab worker, and I personally think it's neat. It's a gimmick, yes, but I'd much rather this than horrible stunt casting.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Just as soon as I can get on the bus to go to the store to buy them.
no subject
no subject